#172 In which we should have taken that left turn at Albuquerque

Sometimes we here at ConstiToonies HQ feel that we cannot deliver an interpretation of current events better than the verbatim report of the event itself. A good example of this is the man of wealth and taste’s skatey-eight bazillion-and-a-half dollar lawsuit against the New York Times in which himself claims that the folks he is suing “baselessly hate President Trump in a deranged way.” As always, the President’s language makes one wonder about its implications: it is okay to hate President Trump in a deranged way if you are not doing so baselessly, or it is okay to baselessly hate President Trump but not in a deranged way? Come to think of it, himself believes that any hatred of Trump is both baseless and deranged, so we’re not quite sure where that leaves us.

Anyhow, getting to our real deranged point, this lawsuit must be seen to be believed. Normally we leave such perusals to our crack CHQ legal team because of, well, all the legalese, but this time we make exception. We will bet anything that you will find this document both fascinating and unbelievable, and that you will reach a point in it where you simply can’t read any further because your suspension of disbelief has finally run out. At least that’s what happened to us. And, so it would seem, the judge who tossed it as “improper and impermissible.”

Have at it: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.447437/gov.uscourts.flmd.447437.1.0.pdf